THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING

On 21 November 2019, Health Ministers and high-level officials from OECD countries will convene in Denmark to debate ‘Health within the 21st Century: Data, Policy and Digital Technology.’

They will discuss the way to best deploy digital technology— and its lifeblood: data—to advance the health of people and populations. a part of their deliberations will specialize in the way to foster trust and co-operation within and across countries to cause this important agenda.

But, why are ‘soft’ elements like trust important in a neighborhood that's principally about technology and science? Moreover, why is it a priority for political leaders and policymakers?

Health Systems are foregoing a chance to Expand Knowledge

Modern health systems are awash with data. These data have a variety of principal uses starting from clinical to administrative. However, because digital information is often shared at minimal incremental cost, these data are often re-deployed towards other important purposes like research or public health interventions.

However, in stark contrast to other industries, health systems rarely put their data to figure during this way. Indeed, only a minority of OECD countries regularly link available datasets for research. The consequence is that in many countries, it's hard to detect whether healthcare treatments and services produce an honest outcome for patients or a poor one, like deaths, readmissions to hospitals, inappropriate prescriptions, or gaps in needed care. It’s also very difficult to use real-world data to advance life science and supply new treatments and better services.

Failure to use data to get new knowledge may be a lost opportunity. However, the key challenges—which include (legitimate) concerns over privacy and a scarcity of common data exchange standards—can not be solved by technology. They require trust and co-operation among stakeholders.

Trust through Good Governance

Personal health data are very sensitive, which suggests trust is critical in enabling their use. Patients and therefore the public must be confident that their data are secure and guarded and, if re-used, that this serves purposes that are per their values and preferences.

Most people are positively disposed to the utilization of their data for purposes that are within the public interest but reservations about certain uses of knowledge also are evident.

Digital technology companies, for instance, are increasingly active in health. they're not only in possession of massive amounts of knowledge but even have the means to derive knowledge from them. This has the potential to yield advancements for health and medical aid. However, experience suggests that the general public is extremely sensitive to their health data being shared with commercial organizations, albeit the stated aims are benevolent. Resolving this tension will open new possibilities, but would require tons of labor and leadership from governments, industry leaders, and every other stakeholder.

Trust is additionally a critical element within the health sector. Data custodians must trust one another and therefore the agencies and organizations tasked with managing, aggregating, and analyzing their data. Provider organizations are going to be reluctant to share their data with other entities if they need mistrust in their security or in whether it's used for agreed purposes.

Trust is earned patiently and incrementally. Additionally to the proper legal and policy settings, and consent and cybersecurity, good governance includes an open and sustained dialogue with stakeholders. It also requires being transparent about how data are used or how the choices about their use are made. Most negative experiences during this area are often primarily attributed to failure on one among these fronts.

Co-Operation to Encourage Common Standards

The world-wide-web would never become the transformative and invaluable resource it's without agreement on a standard data protocol.

Decades on, the health sector is facing an identical situation. Common data standards and exchange formats to form national and international analyses and research far less complex and dear. this is often important across various agencies, regions, and institutions liable for creating, managing and using data within a rustic. It’s also increasingly important on the international stage, because 21st-century health challenges like finding an efficient treatment for dementia, for instance, can only be overcome with knowledge derived from very large datasets. this will only be achieved by pooling data from multiple countries and jurisdictions over the years and decades.

While several noteworthy cross-border projects and interoperable data systems are often found, the health sector lags far behind other industries like banking, transportation, and telecommunications in putting the wealth of knowledge at disposal to figure.

Without co-operation, common rules can't be established and prescribed. Co-operation is, in turn, reliant on trust. Without trust, parties and participants are unlikely to act in straightness and progress is going to be hard.

Leadership to Advance this Agenda

This is a replacement public policy frontier with many uncertainties and unknowns. This naturally creates anxiety, fear, or just inertia, which block the efforts for a wise and coordinated approach to urge the foremost from digital technology and data.

Trust and co-operation play a key role, but they're heavily reliant on political leadership. While the industry, academia, and civil society all play a really important part, trust must be fostered through dialogue and agreement at the very best levels. Events like the one in Copenhagen next month play a crucial part during this regard, but ongoing efforts are going to be required to completely realize the guarantees of the digital transformation in health.